top of page
Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Disability: Back Pain

Disability

Infrequent back pain

Case Swan v LF Beauty (UK) Ltd (2013) Eq Opp Rev 242:29, Bristol ET

Facts S, an employee of LF, was required to wear safety shoes. She complained that the shoes worsened her sciatica, which she described as occurring two or three times a year, and lasting for between one and two weeks. She resigned and complained of disability discrimination.

Decision 1. The claim failed.

2. Sciatica or back pain did not amount to a disability where the bouts of back pain were infrequent and short-lived. Occasional episodes of acute back pain are a common problem for the UK population generally. The effect in this case was minor or trivial.

Recent Posts

See All

THE DECLINE OF LEGAL AID

LEGAL AID Legal aid was conceived as a cornerstone of the welfare state. The system was created by the Legal Aid etc Act 1949 as part of...

MONEY AND THE LAW

Money is the key which unlocks the meaning of English law. Lord Bingham has commented that equality before the law is an aspect of the...

POVERTY AND THE LAW

In 2018 the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights reported that in the UK 14 million people, a fifth of the...

Comentários


bottom of page